+243.6%
ONTO vs FLNC
-69.1%
+312.8%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +1.5% | +4.7% | +5.8% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -4.9% | +3.8% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -27.3% | +24.4% | +4.4% |
| 3M | -2.5% | -61.9% | +59.4% | +20.5% |
| 6M | +28.2% | -34.5% | +62.7% | +33.3% |
| YTD | +69.8% | -47.7% | +117.5% | +79.8% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +53.3% | +109.6% | +105.8% |
| 3Y | +95.9% | -62.4% | +158.4% | +80.9% |
| All | +243.6% | -69.1% | +312.8% | +180.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling