+118.7%
ONTO vs FLNC
-59.3%
+177.9%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.9% | +6.7% | -1.8% | +3.5% |
| 7D | +9.7% | +6.0% | +3.7% | +8.3% |
| 30D | -8.8% | -16.3% | +7.5% | -5.2% |
| 3M | +4.5% | -54.1% | +58.6% | +22.4% |
| 6M | +56.4% | -25.3% | +81.7% | +58.7% |
| YTD | +78.1% | -44.2% | +122.3% | +86.4% |
| 1Y | +171.3% | +53.1% | +118.1% | +117.2% |
| 3Y | +118.7% | -58.3% | +177.0% | +103.1% |
| All | +118.7% | -59.3% | +177.9% | +103.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling