-2.5%
ONTO vs FLNC
-57.4%
+55.0%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +1.5% | +4.7% | +5.0% |
| 7D | -1.0% | -4.9% | +3.8% | +3.0% |
| 30D | -2.9% | -27.3% | +24.4% | +24.9% |
| 3M | -2.5% | -61.9% | +59.4% | +95.6% |
| All | -2.5% | -57.4% | +55.0% | +95.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling