+153.6%
ONTO vs FLNC
+41.0%
+112.6%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.4% | -4.2% | +0.8% | -2.5% |
| 7D | +6.5% | -5.0% | +11.5% | +7.6% |
| 30D | -15.9% | -26.1% | +10.2% | -10.6% |
| 3M | -0.2% | -55.2% | +55.0% | +15.9% |
| 6M | +38.7% | -42.6% | +81.3% | +51.9% |
| YTD | +70.4% | -51.0% | +121.4% | +85.4% |
| 1Y | +153.6% | +43.3% | +110.3% | +113.6% |
| All | +153.6% | +41.0% | +112.6% | +113.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling