+190.3%
RDDT vs LCID
-84.8%
+275.1%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -7.8% | +5.8% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -7.4% | -9.3% | +2.0% | -5.9% |
| 30D | -7.7% | -35.4% | +27.7% | -1.0% |
| 3M | -17.8% | -17.1% | -0.7% | -16.5% |
| 6M | +5.5% | -58.9% | +64.4% | +19.7% |
| YTD | -36.3% | -59.6% | +23.3% | -28.1% |
| 1Y | -39.0% | -78.0% | +38.9% | -23.9% |
| All | +190.3% | -84.8% | +275.1% | +250.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling