+212.8%
RDDT vs LCID
-84.9%
+297.7%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +1.0% | +0.6% | +1.4% |
| 7D | +2.1% | -9.8% | +12.0% | +3.9% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -35.5% | +38.3% | +10.3% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -18.4% | +9.4% | -7.3% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -60.5% | +75.5% | +31.4% |
| YTD | -31.4% | -60.1% | +28.7% | -22.4% |
| 1Y | -39.4% | -78.8% | +39.3% | -23.9% |
| All | +212.8% | -84.9% | +297.7% | +277.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling