+208.0%
RDDT vs LCID
-85.1%
+293.0%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.1% | -2.1% | +8.2% | +6.4% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -9.1% | +8.7% | +1.1% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -37.6% | +37.1% | +7.3% |
| 3M | -9.8% | -11.1% | +1.3% | -9.6% |
| 6M | +15.8% | -59.2% | +75.0% | +31.6% |
| YTD | -32.4% | -60.5% | +28.0% | -23.5% |
| 1Y | -40.0% | -78.5% | +38.5% | -24.9% |
| All | +208.0% | -85.1% | +293.0% | +272.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling