+206.2%
RDDT vs DECK
-43.9%
+250.1%
-61.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +1.6% | -2.5% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +1.0% | -2.2% | +3.2% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -13.6% | +13.1% | +4.4% |
| 3M | -16.0% | -21.2% | +5.2% | -9.1% |
| 6M | +4.9% | -21.1% | +26.0% | +12.8% |
| YTD | -32.8% | -17.2% | -15.6% | -29.8% |
| 1Y | -33.5% | -30.7% | -2.7% | -26.1% |
| All | +206.2% | -43.9% | +250.1% | +265.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling