+86.0%
RDDT vs DECK
-42.6%
+128.6%
-66.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.9% | -1.5% | -6.4% | -7.4% |
| 7D | -27.6% | +6.0% | -33.6% | -29.0% |
| 30D | -37.0% | +7.4% | -44.5% | -38.5% |
| 3M | -39.6% | -11.7% | -27.9% | -37.0% |
| 6M | -45.3% | -11.0% | -34.4% | -43.3% |
| YTD | -59.2% | -15.4% | -43.8% | -57.6% |
| 1Y | -52.2% | +7.2% | -59.5% | -55.0% |
| All | +86.0% | -42.6% | +128.6% | +120.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling