+109.5%
RDDT vs DECK
-42.2%
+151.7%
-66.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.1% | -1.6% | +8.7% | +7.6% |
| 7D | +3.7% | -0.8% | +4.5% | +4.0% |
| 30D | -33.9% | +4.9% | -38.8% | -34.9% |
| 3M | -32.4% | -5.8% | -26.5% | -31.0% |
| 6M | -33.8% | -8.6% | -25.2% | -31.8% |
| YTD | -54.0% | -14.7% | -39.3% | -52.4% |
| 1Y | -49.3% | +6.9% | -56.1% | -52.2% |
| All | +109.5% | -42.2% | +151.7% | +147.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling