+95.6%
RDDT vs DECK
-41.3%
+136.9%
-66.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -0.7% | -1.4% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +6.8% | -4.2% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -38.3% | +8.3% | -46.6% | -39.9% |
| 3M | -37.8% | -7.9% | -30.0% | -36.1% |
| 6M | -36.7% | -10.6% | -26.1% | -34.3% |
| YTD | -57.1% | -13.4% | -43.7% | -55.8% |
| 1Y | -51.7% | +12.5% | -64.1% | -55.3% |
| All | +95.6% | -41.3% | +136.9% | +130.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling