-77.5%
PLTD vs EPAM
-53.3%
-24.3%
-80.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -2.4% | +7.0% | +3.6% |
| 7D | +5.9% | +2.0% | +4.0% | +7.0% |
| 30D | -11.6% | +6.5% | -18.1% | -7.9% |
| 3M | -29.9% | +19.9% | -49.9% | -21.5% |
| 6M | -28.5% | -16.9% | -11.6% | -31.2% |
| YTD | -20.4% | -42.9% | +22.5% | -34.4% |
| 1Y | -33.3% | -30.4% | -2.9% | -38.1% |
| All | -77.5% | -53.3% | -24.3% | -82.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling