-27.8%
PLTD vs EPAM
+50.2%
-78.0%
-55.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.5% | +20.6% | -11.1% | +13.1% |
| 7D | +25.1% | +23.0% | +2.0% | +30.0% |
| 30D | +21.0% | +51.6% | -30.6% | +36.7% |
| 3M | -2.9% | +50.8% | -53.8% | +11.5% |
| 6M | -27.8% | +51.1% | -78.9% | -14.7% |
| All | -27.8% | +50.2% | -78.0% | -14.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling