-76.1%
PLTD vs EPAM
-36.4%
-39.7%
-83.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -3.9% | +0.7% | -4.5% |
| 7D | +13.7% | +13.4% | +0.4% | +18.3% |
| 30D | +18.4% | +47.1% | -28.6% | +38.0% |
| 3M | -7.5% | +71.2% | -78.6% | +16.5% |
| 6M | -31.3% | +48.9% | -80.2% | -16.1% |
| YTD | -15.4% | -22.2% | +6.9% | -21.2% |
| 1Y | -18.4% | -5.2% | -13.2% | -14.1% |
| All | -76.1% | -36.4% | -39.7% | -78.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling