-77.5%
PLTD vs ACGL
+4.1%
-81.6%
-80.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.7% | +6.4% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +5.9% | -0.7% | +6.7% | +5.9% |
| 30D | -11.6% | -1.0% | -10.6% | -11.6% |
| 3M | -29.9% | +11.0% | -41.0% | -29.7% |
| 6M | -28.5% | -0.3% | -28.2% | -28.6% |
| YTD | -20.4% | +2.3% | -22.7% | -20.1% |
| 1Y | -33.3% | +6.4% | -39.6% | -32.7% |
| All | -77.5% | +4.1% | -81.6% | -77.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling