-77.7%
PLTD vs ACGL
+15.9%
-93.7%
-83.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +0.1% | +0.3% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -9.8% | -1.2% | -8.5% | -9.7% |
| 30D | +18.9% | +12.8% | +6.1% | +18.6% |
| 3M | -4.2% | +12.3% | -16.5% | -4.5% |
| 6M | -34.8% | +15.8% | -50.7% | -35.0% |
| YTD | -21.1% | +13.9% | -35.0% | -21.1% |
| 1Y | -19.3% | +19.0% | -38.3% | -18.4% |
| All | -77.7% | +15.9% | -93.7% | -77.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling