-76.1%
PLTD vs ACGL
+13.8%
-90.0%
-83.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -3.0% | -0.2% | -3.0% |
| 7D | +13.7% | +0.9% | +12.9% | +13.7% |
| 30D | +18.4% | +13.7% | +4.7% | +18.3% |
| 3M | -7.5% | +8.0% | -15.5% | -7.6% |
| 6M | -31.3% | +13.3% | -44.6% | -31.4% |
| YTD | -15.4% | +11.8% | -27.2% | -15.2% |
| 1Y | -18.4% | +22.2% | -40.7% | -16.4% |
| All | -76.1% | +13.8% | -90.0% | -76.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling