+11.6%
ONTO vs KRMN
+53.0%
-41.4%
-58.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +12.0% | +0.6% | +11.3% | +11.8% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +17.3% | -15.9% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -34.1% | +40.8% | -75.0% | -41.0% |
| 3M | -37.1% | -21.2% | -15.9% | -34.0% |
| 6M | -31.8% | -24.6% | -7.3% | -29.2% |
| YTD | +22.9% | -37.3% | +60.2% | +30.6% |
| 1Y | +39.5% | -35.1% | +74.6% | +45.5% |
| All | +11.6% | +53.0% | -41.4% | -21.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling