+61.2%
ONTO vs KRMN
-37.8%
+99.0%
-58.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.9% | +1.8% | +7.1% | +8.4% |
| 7D | +16.4% | +30.8% | -14.4% | +6.8% |
| 30D | -21.4% | +40.2% | -61.6% | -29.2% |
| 3M | -32.7% | -27.8% | -4.9% | -27.3% |
| 6M | -25.2% | -24.0% | -1.2% | -22.5% |
| YTD | +36.2% | -38.9% | +75.2% | +43.5% |
| 1Y | +61.2% | -35.6% | +96.8% | +64.9% |
| All | +61.2% | -37.8% | +99.0% | +64.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling