-0.3%
ONTO vs KRMN
+52.0%
-52.4%
-58.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.1% | +42.1% | -31.0% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -14.0% | +14.2% | -28.2% | -18.2% |
| 30D | -43.1% | +45.3% | -88.4% | -49.5% |
| 3M | -35.5% | -17.3% | -18.2% | -33.3% |
| 6M | -41.1% | -27.8% | -13.3% | -38.0% |
| YTD | +9.8% | -37.7% | +47.4% | +16.8% |
| 1Y | +31.5% | -39.2% | +70.7% | +39.7% |
| All | -0.3% | +52.0% | -52.4% | -29.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling