+269.1%
ONTO vs GTLB
-47.1%
+316.2%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +1.1% | +5.1% | +5.9% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +11.1% | -12.1% | -3.5% |
| 30D | -2.9% | +37.8% | -40.7% | -10.2% |
| 3M | -2.5% | +61.6% | -64.0% | -13.8% |
| 6M | +28.2% | +98.9% | -70.7% | +5.4% |
| YTD | +69.8% | +32.8% | +37.0% | +53.3% |
| 1Y | +162.9% | +14.7% | +148.2% | +144.4% |
| 3Y | +95.9% | +1.3% | +94.6% | +81.0% |
| All | +269.1% | -47.1% | +316.2% | +230.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling