-41.1%
ONTO vs GTLB
+100.0%
-141.0%
-58.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.1% | -1.8% | +12.9% | +11.0% |
| 7D | -14.0% | -11.1% | -2.9% | -14.5% |
| 30D | -43.1% | -7.5% | -35.6% | -42.7% |
| 3M | -35.5% | +34.8% | -70.3% | -31.5% |
| 6M | -41.1% | +98.0% | -139.1% | -30.0% |
| All | -41.1% | +100.0% | -141.0% | -30.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling