+58.4%
ONTO vs GTLB
+4.2%
+54.2%
-62.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.9% | +1.4% | +7.5% | +8.6% |
| 7D | +16.4% | -9.6% | +26.0% | +19.1% |
| 30D | -21.4% | -15.5% | -5.9% | -18.5% |
| 3M | -32.7% | +12.4% | -45.1% | -34.8% |
| 6M | -25.2% | +84.6% | -109.8% | -36.5% |
| YTD | +36.2% | +26.1% | +10.1% | +27.4% |
| 1Y | +61.2% | +1.7% | +59.5% | +61.2% |
| All | +58.4% | +4.2% | +54.2% | +71.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling