-10.8%
NIO vs KRMN
+33.3%
-44.1%
-51.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -1.3% | -0.2% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -13.0% | -12.3% | -0.8% | -11.9% |
| 30D | -18.3% | -27.5% | +9.2% | -15.8% |
| 3M | -33.2% | -26.5% | -6.7% | -31.5% |
| 6M | -21.5% | -59.6% | +38.1% | -15.3% |
| YTD | -25.5% | -45.4% | +19.9% | -22.5% |
| 1Y | -38.0% | -25.1% | -12.9% | -36.9% |
| All | -10.8% | +33.3% | -44.1% | -22.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling