-31.9%
NIO vs KRMN
+35.5%
-67.5%
-63.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | +0.4% | -5.3% | -5.0% |
| 7D | -14.5% | -10.9% | -3.6% | -13.4% |
| 30D | -15.0% | +34.9% | -49.9% | -18.1% |
| 3M | -35.6% | -32.8% | -2.8% | -33.9% |
| 6M | -55.7% | -39.6% | -16.1% | -54.2% |
| YTD | -43.1% | -44.4% | +1.3% | -41.6% |
| 1Y | -53.5% | -32.2% | -21.3% | -53.5% |
| All | -31.9% | +35.5% | -67.5% | -41.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling