-13.1%
NIO vs KRMN
+17.4%
-30.5%
-53.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | -11.3% | +8.9% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -12.9% | +8.7% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -23.2% | -43.3% | +20.1% | -19.0% |
| 3M | -29.9% | -27.2% | -2.7% | -28.2% |
| 6M | -25.1% | -66.8% | +41.7% | -17.8% |
| YTD | -27.5% | -51.9% | +24.4% | -23.6% |
| 1Y | -41.1% | -43.7% | +2.6% | -38.7% |
| All | -13.1% | +17.4% | -30.5% | -23.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling