-53.9%
NIO vs KRMN
-59.3%
+5.4%
-56.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | -13.5% | +17.0% | +4.5% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -10.0% | +9.4% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -3.5% | +3.5% | -7.0% | -4.2% |
| 3M | -30.7% | -36.7% | +6.0% | -28.2% |
| 6M | -45.6% | -47.7% | +2.1% | -42.9% |
| YTD | -35.3% | -53.3% | +18.0% | -32.7% |
| 1Y | -53.9% | -59.7% | +5.7% | -51.8% |
| All | -53.9% | -59.3% | +5.4% | -51.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling