+28.5%
NFLX vs ZTS
-62.9%
+91.3%
-75.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -3.0% | +1.1% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -4.8% | -0.2% | -3.4% |
| 30D | +3.5% | +1.2% | +2.3% | +3.1% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -6.0% | -1.1% | -5.4% |
| 6M | -22.5% | -38.7% | +16.3% | -9.8% |
| YTD | -18.1% | -40.6% | +22.5% | -3.6% |
| 1Y | -38.3% | -50.6% | +12.3% | -22.3% |
| 3Y | +73.4% | -58.7% | +132.1% | +129.8% |
| All | +28.5% | -62.9% | +91.3% | +74.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling