+70.7%
NFLX vs ZTS
-59.0%
+129.7%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.3% | -0.6% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -8.1% | -3.8% | -4.3% | -7.6% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -2.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% |
| 3M | -6.6% | -10.2% | +3.6% | -5.4% |
| 6M | -22.7% | -39.4% | +16.7% | -18.2% |
| YTD | -18.9% | -40.8% | +21.9% | -13.9% |
| 1Y | -39.8% | -50.1% | +10.3% | -34.6% |
| All | +70.7% | -59.0% | +129.7% | +94.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling