-43.2%
NFLX vs ZTS
-29.4%
-13.8%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | +0.1% | +1.9% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -2.8% | -7.4% | +4.6% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -8.6% | +9.9% | -18.5% | -10.1% |
| 3M | -13.7% | +10.3% | -24.0% | -15.3% |
| 6M | -24.5% | +9.2% | -33.7% | -25.9% |
| YTD | -31.2% | -32.9% | +1.7% | -29.3% |
| 1Y | -43.2% | -29.7% | -13.5% | -41.7% |
| All | -43.2% | -29.4% | -13.8% | -41.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling