-39.3%
NFLX vs ZTS
-26.9%
-12.3%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +7.5% | -2.8% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +7.1% | +15.4% | -8.3% | +4.3% |
| 30D | -1.6% | +25.8% | -27.4% | -5.4% |
| 3M | -9.8% | +18.1% | -27.9% | -12.6% |
| 6M | -27.1% | -19.7% | -7.3% | -27.9% |
| YTD | -29.2% | -27.5% | -1.7% | -28.4% |
| 1Y | -39.3% | -26.7% | -12.5% | -38.2% |
| All | -39.3% | -26.9% | -12.3% | -38.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling