+46.7%
NFLX vs HTZ
-89.5%
+136.2%
-75.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | +1.3% | -6.7% | -5.4% |
| 7D | -4.2% | +7.5% | -11.7% | -4.7% |
| 30D | +5.5% | +47.4% | -42.0% | +2.1% |
| 3M | -4.1% | -54.9% | +50.8% | -0.5% |
| 6M | -20.7% | -47.0% | +26.3% | -19.4% |
| YTD | -16.5% | -55.3% | +38.7% | -14.3% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | -57.6% | +19.9% | -36.5% |
| 3Y | +77.9% | -86.6% | +164.5% | +110.2% |
| 5Y | +32.5% | -86.1% | +118.6% | +56.0% |
| All | +46.7% | -89.5% | +136.2% | +71.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling