+50.8%
NFLX vs HTZ
-81.0%
+131.8%
-53.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -20.8% | +19.5% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +5.7% | -7.7% | +13.4% | +5.7% |
| 30D | -4.6% | -13.1% | +8.6% | -4.4% |
| 3M | -11.6% | +14.7% | -26.4% | -12.0% |
| 6M | -25.4% | -70.6% | +45.2% | -24.6% |
| YTD | -30.1% | -65.2% | +35.1% | -29.6% |
| 1Y | -40.3% | -73.2% | +32.9% | -39.8% |
| All | +50.8% | -81.0% | +131.8% | +49.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling