-43.2%
NFLX vs HTZ
-73.6%
+30.4%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | +9.3% | -7.3% | +1.9% |
| 7D | -2.8% | -27.4% | +24.6% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -11.4% | +2.8% | -8.4% |
| 3M | -13.7% | -33.1% | +19.4% | -13.9% |
| 6M | -24.5% | -73.5% | +49.0% | -24.1% |
| YTD | -31.2% | -68.1% | +36.9% | -32.1% |
| 1Y | -43.2% | -74.3% | +31.1% | -44.1% |
| All | -43.2% | -73.6% | +30.4% | -44.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling