+1,031.9%
NBIS vs ARMK
+46.3%
+985.6%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.5% | -0.9% | +8.4% | +8.0% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -2.4% | +10.6% | +9.9% |
| 30D | +3.4% | 0.0% | +3.4% | +3.7% |
| 3M | -12.8% | +6.7% | -19.5% | -16.1% |
| 6M | +131.5% | +38.8% | +92.7% | +88.4% |
| YTD | +170.5% | +55.2% | +115.3% | +100.6% |
| 1Y | +248.8% | +46.6% | +202.2% | +169.2% |
| All | +1,031.9% | +46.3% | +985.6% | +741.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling