+1,022.8%
NBIS vs ARMK
+50.9%
+971.9%
-58.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +3.2% | -4.7% | -3.6% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +3.1% | -3.9% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -13.4% | -2.8% | -10.6% | -11.6% |
| 3M | +1.0% | +7.6% | -6.5% | -3.4% |
| 6M | +100.5% | +47.9% | +52.6% | +56.3% |
| YTD | +168.3% | +60.0% | +108.2% | +95.0% |
| 1Y | +151.8% | +52.2% | +99.5% | +89.3% |
| All | +1,022.8% | +50.9% | +971.9% | +717.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling