+144.3%
NBIS vs ARMK
+49.9%
+94.3%
-48.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.1% | -0.3% | -4.8% | -5.0% |
| 7D | +8.3% | -0.9% | +9.2% | +8.7% |
| 30D | +18.1% | -5.9% | +24.0% | +20.9% |
| 3M | +7.8% | +6.7% | +1.1% | +6.8% |
| 6M | +136.6% | +42.5% | +94.0% | +128.1% |
| YTD | +172.5% | +55.1% | +117.4% | +160.9% |
| 1Y | +144.3% | +50.3% | +93.9% | +139.6% |
| All | +144.3% | +49.9% | +94.3% | +139.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling