+26.5%
LSCC vs NIO
-18.5%
+44.9%
-28.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | -1.6% | +3.6% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +1.3% | -13.0% | +14.4% | +5.0% |
| 30D | -9.7% | -18.3% | +8.6% | -4.9% |
| 3M | -23.7% | -33.2% | +9.5% | -15.4% |
| 6M | +26.5% | -21.5% | +48.0% | +28.8% |
| All | +26.5% | -18.5% | +44.9% | +28.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling