+69.8%
LSCC vs NIO
-51.1%
+120.9%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.4% | +0.6% | +7.9% | +8.3% |
| 7D | +19.3% | +6.9% | +12.4% | +17.4% |
| 30D | -9.6% | -4.7% | -4.9% | -8.6% |
| 3M | -12.4% | -28.1% | +15.6% | -5.7% |
| 6M | -10.5% | -41.7% | +31.3% | +0.7% |
| YTD | +54.8% | -33.1% | +87.9% | +70.9% |
| All | +69.8% | -51.1% | +120.9% | +100.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling