+19.5%
LSCC vs NIO
-92.6%
+112.2%
-61.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.6% | -3.0% | -5.6% | -7.8% |
| 7D | -4.8% | -3.6% | -1.2% | -3.8% |
| 30D | -27.1% | -8.0% | -19.1% | -25.4% |
| 3M | -23.6% | -31.2% | +7.6% | -15.8% |
| 6M | -19.8% | -45.8% | +25.9% | -6.5% |
| YTD | +33.2% | -37.3% | +70.5% | +47.9% |
| 1Y | +55.2% | -56.1% | +111.3% | +88.7% |
| 3Y | +70.1% | -61.1% | +131.2% | +92.8% |
| 5Y | +19.5% | -92.4% | +112.0% | +85.9% |
| All | +19.5% | -92.6% | +112.2% | +85.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling