-95.3%
LCID vs EPAM
-64.0%
-31.2%
-99.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -2.4% | +4.1% | +2.5% |
| 7D | -6.6% | +2.0% | -8.5% | -7.2% |
| 30D | -30.1% | +6.5% | -36.7% | -32.2% |
| 3M | -17.6% | +19.9% | -37.5% | -23.5% |
| 6M | -54.4% | -16.9% | -37.5% | -52.4% |
| YTD | -55.7% | -42.9% | -12.8% | -48.3% |
| 1Y | -71.0% | -30.4% | -40.7% | -68.4% |
| 3Y | -92.6% | -54.7% | -37.9% | -91.1% |
| 5Y | -97.6% | -81.8% | -15.8% | -96.2% |
| All | -95.3% | -64.0% | -31.2% | -94.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling