-92.4%
LCID vs EPAM
-33.7%
-58.7%
-94.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +10.4% | -3.9% | +14.3% | +11.3% |
| 7D | +8.9% | +13.4% | -4.4% | +4.1% |
| 30D | -15.4% | +47.1% | -62.5% | -25.4% |
| 3M | -52.9% | +71.2% | -124.0% | -60.5% |
| 6M | -46.8% | +48.9% | -95.8% | -54.2% |
| YTD | -68.9% | -22.2% | -46.6% | -67.2% |
| 1Y | -81.7% | -5.2% | -76.5% | -81.9% |
| 3Y | -92.4% | -34.9% | -57.4% | -92.6% |
| All | -92.4% | -33.7% | -58.7% | -92.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling