-99.3%
LCID vs EPAM
-75.7%
-23.6%
-99.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.2% | -0.4% | -8.8% | -9.1% |
| 7D | -10.2% | +2.4% | -12.6% | -10.8% |
| 30D | -10.2% | +42.3% | -52.5% | -20.7% |
| 3M | -54.1% | +60.7% | -114.8% | -61.1% |
| 6M | -53.8% | +80.5% | -134.3% | -62.8% |
| YTD | -72.0% | -20.4% | -51.7% | -71.2% |
| 1Y | -80.5% | -9.6% | -70.9% | -80.7% |
| 3Y | -92.6% | -30.5% | -62.1% | -92.3% |
| All | -99.3% | -75.7% | -23.6% | -99.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling