-70.6%
HTZ vs GTLB
+97.3%
-167.9%
-76.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | -6.5% | -14.3% | -21.1% |
| 7D | -7.7% | -13.5% | +5.8% | -9.0% |
| 30D | -13.1% | -5.1% | -8.0% | -13.2% |
| 3M | +14.7% | +35.5% | -20.7% | +21.7% |
| 6M | -70.6% | +97.2% | -167.8% | -65.2% |
| All | -70.6% | +97.3% | -167.9% | -65.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling