-61.1%
HTZ vs GTLB
+121.0%
-182.1%
-76.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | 0.0% | +9.2% | +9.2% |
| 7D | +18.9% | -9.7% | +28.6% | +17.5% |
| 30D | +26.3% | +1.7% | +24.6% | +26.6% |
| 3M | +49.7% | +43.6% | +6.1% | +59.0% |
| 6M | -61.1% | +113.0% | -174.1% | -53.6% |
| All | -61.1% | +121.0% | -182.1% | -53.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling