-80.2%
HTZ vs GTLB
+14.8%
-95.0%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | -6.5% | -14.3% | -20.0% |
| 7D | -7.7% | -13.5% | +5.8% | -6.0% |
| 30D | -13.1% | -5.1% | -8.0% | -12.6% |
| 3M | +14.7% | +35.5% | -20.7% | +10.4% |
| 6M | -70.6% | +97.2% | -167.8% | -73.5% |
| YTD | -65.2% | +30.5% | -95.7% | -66.5% |
| 1Y | -73.2% | +6.9% | -80.1% | -73.3% |
| All | -80.2% | +14.8% | -95.0% | -82.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling