-73.5%
HTZ vs GTLB
+4.0%
-77.5%
-80.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.4% | -1.8% | -6.5% | -8.3% |
| 7D | -14.6% | -11.1% | -3.5% | -14.5% |
| 30D | -20.8% | -7.5% | -13.3% | -20.7% |
| 3M | -18.8% | +34.8% | -53.6% | -17.8% |
| 6M | -74.7% | +98.0% | -172.7% | -74.2% |
| YTD | -68.1% | +28.1% | -96.2% | -66.2% |
| 1Y | -73.5% | +5.6% | -79.0% | -71.4% |
| All | -73.5% | +4.0% | -77.5% | -71.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling