-38.1%
GLXY vs NIO
-19.6%
-18.5%
-69.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.8% | -3.8% | +1.1% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -16.2% | +2.8% | -19.0% | -17.0% |
| 30D | -30.6% | -8.4% | -22.2% | -28.5% |
| 3M | -27.7% | -32.0% | +4.2% | -18.6% |
| 6M | -53.3% | -43.9% | -9.4% | -44.6% |
| YTD | -36.9% | -35.7% | -1.2% | -28.6% |
| 1Y | -55.6% | -51.1% | -4.5% | -46.5% |
| All | -38.1% | -19.6% | -18.5% | -30.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling