-54.4%
GLXY vs NIO
-51.1%
-3.3%
-62.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +0.6% | +5.6% | +6.0% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +6.9% | -7.4% | -3.5% |
| 30D | -28.6% | -4.7% | -23.9% | -27.0% |
| 3M | -28.1% | -28.1% | 0.0% | -18.3% |
| 6M | -52.0% | -41.7% | -10.3% | -41.4% |
| YTD | -35.1% | -33.1% | -2.0% | -25.7% |
| All | -54.4% | -51.1% | -3.3% | -42.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling