-48.0%
GLXY vs NIO
-53.4%
+5.3%
-62.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +13.2% | -1.2% | +14.4% | +13.7% |
| 7D | +14.3% | -1.8% | +16.1% | +15.2% |
| 30D | -19.6% | -6.6% | -13.0% | -17.1% |
| 3M | -20.7% | -29.9% | +9.2% | -8.8% |
| 6M | -49.6% | -46.6% | -3.0% | -36.4% |
| YTD | -28.6% | -36.5% | +7.9% | -16.5% |
| 1Y | -48.0% | -51.1% | +3.1% | -32.8% |
| All | -48.0% | -53.4% | +5.3% | -32.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling