-36.4%
GLXY vs NIO
-16.4%
-19.9%
-69.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +0.6% | +5.6% | +6.0% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +6.9% | -7.4% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -28.6% | -4.7% | -23.9% | -27.4% |
| 3M | -28.1% | -28.1% | 0.0% | -20.5% |
| 6M | -52.0% | -41.7% | -10.3% | -43.7% |
| YTD | -35.1% | -33.1% | -2.0% | -27.5% |
| 1Y | -54.0% | -50.3% | -3.7% | -45.0% |
| All | -36.4% | -16.4% | -19.9% | -29.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling