+144.5%
DINO vs MSTZ
-99.3%
+243.8%
-44.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | +2.6% | -3.3% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +5.7% | -29.7% | +35.4% | +4.7% |
| 30D | +27.8% | -65.3% | +93.1% | +23.7% |
| 3M | +45.6% | -57.3% | +103.0% | +43.4% |
| 6M | +88.5% | -61.6% | +150.1% | +86.3% |
| YTD | +134.1% | -78.3% | +212.4% | +130.4% |
| 1Y | +111.1% | -30.2% | +141.4% | +120.9% |
| All | +144.5% | -99.3% | +243.8% | +136.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling