+150.9%
DINO vs MSTZ
-99.2%
+250.0%
-44.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +5.5% | -5.6% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +2.0% | -23.6% | +25.5% | +1.3% |
| 30D | +27.7% | -60.7% | +88.4% | +24.1% |
| 3M | +56.3% | -58.3% | +114.5% | +53.5% |
| 6M | +107.6% | -60.0% | +167.6% | +105.2% |
| YTD | +140.2% | -75.2% | +215.4% | +137.5% |
| 1Y | +113.0% | -19.9% | +132.9% | +124.0% |
| All | +150.9% | -99.2% | +250.0% | +143.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling